“Sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me.” At least that’s what I was told to retort on the school playground when the other kids said mean and nasty things. Of course, we know that’s a crock. Words can be the death of us. Verbal abuse and the vitriol spilled from the tongue can scar children for life, ruin careers and reputations, and generally wreak all kinds of havoc. And, of course, when the words are accompanied by pictures worth a thousand of them – be they poses purloined by relentless paparazzi or drunken teenagers with a smart phone – sticks and stones might seem merciful. We pass laws against libel, slander and hate crimes for a reason. Pity we don’t have laws against political ads! As role models for our youth, parliamentarians too often make us want to blush with shame at having elected them, especially during campaigns and Q & A sessions when it’s obvious that their mothers never washed their mouths out with soap. Whatever happened to civil discourse, even during disagreements? Honourable members, they are not.
Attack ads are alleged to work, although there is increasing evidence that this is less and less likely to be the case, at least where people with a working synapse are concerned. What is more evident, apart from the way they poison the airwaves, is that attack ads appear to normalize and even give some kind of official sanction not only to rudeness, but to deceit. If you repeat a lie often enough and loudly enough, folks may well come to believe it. But to win power by being a better liar than your opponent is hardly a noble victory and certainly one void of any virtue.
“If you can’t say something nice about someone, don’t say anything at all” is, I admit, rather naïve advice especially when there is truth to be told and evil to be resisted. But surely we can request higher standards from politicians and other figures than trench mouth slurs and sandbox name calling that are little more than toxic fuel for violence of the sticks and stones and bombs and bullets type. Matthew, Mark and Luke all record that Jesus occasionally called his critics a bunch of hypocrites. Matthew even has Jesus call them a brood of vipers (Matthew 12.24; 23.33). Maybe it wasn’t one of Jesus’ better days. Or maybe the gospel writers were putting words in Jesus’ mouth to make Jesus a poster child for bones they had to pick with folks who said nasty things about their congregations. But Jesus could hardly be seen to be a big fan of attack ads and potty politics: “For out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks. The good person brings good things out of a good treasure, and the evil person brings evil things out of an evil treasure. I tell you, on the day of judgement you will give an account for every careless word you utter; for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.” (Matthew 12.34b-37).
Something tells me Jesus wasn’t simply talking about Election Day!
wws
